<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SurfaceRama.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.surfacerama.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.surfacerama.com</link>
	<description>All about Microsoft Surface Multi-Touch Tabletop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:08:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft Surface aids in beefing up the security at the SuperBowl XLIII</title>
		<link>http://www.surfacerama.com/2009/02/02/microsoft-surface-aids-in-beefing-up-the-security-at-the-superbowl-xliii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfacerama.com/2009/02/02/microsoft-surface-aids-in-beefing-up-the-security-at-the-superbowl-xliii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sriharsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surface News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-sponder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharepoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfacerama.com/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Microsoft Surface
The Microsoft Surface technology is playing a key role in beefing up the security at the SuperBowl this year. With a slew of technology partners, a &#8220;command and Control platform&#8221; is being built owing to the Sharepoint, E-Sponder and Microsoft Surface.
One would wonder about how could such a technology aid in security related issues. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1379853616964965";
/* 336x280, created 1/26/10 */
google_ad_slot = "4382441257";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p><p><a href="http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-US&amp;playlist=videoByUuids:uuids:286ccd43-a8c8-4fd8-be1f-f942d4da016f&amp;showPlaylist=true&amp;from=shared">Microsoft Surface</a></p>
<p>The Microsoft Surface technology is playing a key role in beefing up the security at the SuperBowl this year. With a slew of technology partners, a &#8220;command and Control platform&#8221; is being built owing to the Sharepoint, E-Sponder and Microsoft Surface.</p>
<p>One would wonder about how could such a technology aid in security related issues. The post at ArsTechnica described the role of the Surface as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>The tabletop computer will display a Microsoft Virtual Earth map of the area with real-time information about events, incidents, and tasks for the Tampa Incident Command staff. In this way, the security staff will be able to more easily manage the nearly a quarter of a million people in Tampa for Super Bowl-related activities. They&#8217;ll be able to zoom in and display a 3D image of the city, including detailed views of buildings and streets and real-time resource tracking.</p></blockquote>
No Tags<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.surfacerama.com%2F2009%2F02%2F02%2Fmicrosoft-surface-aids-in-beefing-up-the-security-at-the-superbowl-xliii%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Microsoft+Surface+aids+in+beefing+up+the+security+at+the+SuperBowl+XLIII';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfacerama.com/2009/02/02/microsoft-surface-aids-in-beefing-up-the-security-at-the-superbowl-xliii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Sinofsky: No Second Beta for Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.surfacerama.com/2009/02/02/steve-sinofsky-no-second-beta-for-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfacerama.com/2009/02/02/steve-sinofsky-no-second-beta-for-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sriharsha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve sinofsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfacerama.com/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


The rumors of a pre-eminent Windows 7 beta release 2 are put to rest following the official confirmation from the man In-charge of the project. Steve Sinofsky, posted a blog saying that Windows 7 was a major hit among the developers and software testers, who related their experience with the brand new OS as &#8220;Super [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rumors of a pre-eminent Windows 7 beta release 2 are put to rest following the official confirmation from the man In-charge of the project. <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2009/01/30/our-next-engineering-milestone.aspx" target="_blank">Steve Sinofsky, posted a blog </a>saying that Windows 7 was a major hit among the developers and software testers, who related their experience with the brand new OS as &#8220;Super Happy&#8221;. He clarified that the blog post had nothing to do with the shipping date and the plasible change in plans from the Redmond giant.</p>
<p>He precisely put up a compendium of the litany of terms used just to inhibit any peradventures:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Pre-Beta </strong>– This release at the PDC introduced the developer community to Windows 7 and represents the platform complete release and disclosure of the features.</li>
<li><strong>Beta </strong>– This release provided a couple of million folks the opportunity to use feature complete Windows 7 while also providing the telemetry and feedback necessary for us to validate the quality, reliability, compatibility, and experience of Windows 7. As we said, we are working with our partners across the ecosystem to make sure that testing and validation and development of Windows 7-based products begins to enter final phases as we move through the Beta.</li>
<li><strong>Release Candidate (RC) </strong>– This release will be Windows 7 as we intend to ship it. We will continue to listen to feedback and telemetry with the focus on addressing only the most critical issues that arise. We will be very clear in communicating any changes that have a visible impact on the product. This release allows the whole ecosystem to reach a known state together and make sure that we are all ready together for the Release to Manufacturing. Once we get to RC, the whole ecosystem is in “dress rehearsal” mode for the next steps.</li>
<li><strong>Release to Manufacturing (RTM) </strong>– This release is the final Windows 7 as we intend to make available to PC makers and for retail and volume license products.</li>
<li><strong>General Availability (GA)</strong> – This is a business milestone and represents when you can buy Windows 7 pre-installed on PCs or as full packaged product.</li>
</ul>
<p>What is to be seen is that if they can really keep up their word this time around. The release of this neophytic version was not hyped following the response they&#8217;ve garnered with the Vista. Now, Microsoft is seeing Windows 7 as their saviour as they wish to dust off their bruises and build up their reputation once again. This would be crucial, with Bill Gates no more in there to save them they will have to bank hopes on 7, and untill now it hasn&#8217;t let them down.</p>
No Tags<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.surfacerama.com%2F2009%2F02%2F02%2Fsteve-sinofsky-no-second-beta-for-windows-7%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Steve+Sinofsky%3A+No+Second+Beta+for+Windows+7';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfacerama.com/2009/02/02/steve-sinofsky-no-second-beta-for-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming Soon: The WiNdOwS ClOuD !</title>
		<link>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/10/06/coming-soon-the-windows-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/10/06/coming-soon-the-windows-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Surface News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfacerama.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
No Tags
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.surfacerama.com%2F2008%2F10%2F06%2Fcoming-soon-the-windows-cloud%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Coming+Soon%3A+The+WiNdOwS+ClOuD+%21';
  addthis_pub    = '';

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.surfacerama.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/11581.jpg'><img src="http://www.surfacerama.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/11581.jpg" alt="Windows Cloud" title="Windows Cloud" width="500" height="650" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-171" /></a></p>
No Tags<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.surfacerama.com%2F2008%2F10%2F06%2Fcoming-soon-the-windows-cloud%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Coming+Soon%3A+The+WiNdOwS+ClOuD+%21';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/10/06/coming-soon-the-windows-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ups and Downs of Windows 7 Mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/10/02/the-ups-and-downs-of-windows-7-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/10/02/the-ups-and-downs-of-windows-7-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfacerama.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 Mobile release will  be delayed. This powerful operating system for mobile phone is currently  on its 6.1 version and the next update will not be available until the  second half of 2009. Considering the time of release of the latest OS  of Windows Mobile (6.1 version) the next release [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="small;">Windows 7 Mobile release will  be delayed. This powerful operating system for mobile phone is currently  on its 6.1 version and the next update will not be available until the  second half of 2009. Considering the time of release of the latest OS  of Windows Mobile (6.1 version) the next release could be a little bit  late for Microsoft. </span></p>
<p><span style="small;">There are two sides of the  coin for this delay. Obviously, the lack of updates in Windows Mobile  will give chance to its competitors to move forward with their mobile  phones and software. The mobile phone industry is a very volatile industry  that by the time Windows 7 Mobile would come out, everyone has already  established their position and there might not be enough space for Windows  7 Mobile. The partner manufacturers of Microsoft are already frowning  in this move and although they can’t just transfer to other OS, it’s  still a possibility. </span></p>
<p><span style="small;">On the other hand, there is  a good reason why Microsoft has put a hold in its latest offering of  Windows Mobile operating system. Obviously, Microsoft didn’t want  to send out another Windows CE OS that really won’t get any nods from  tech reviewers.  They wanted to send out an operating system that  could easily compete with iPhone, Blackberry and the recently released  Android. It’s said that Microsoft will be coming out with an OS that  could handle Ajax and <a href="http://www.swfmaestro.com/" target="_blank">Flash based applications</a>. The handling of Ajax  has become clearer now that Microsoft now uses JQuery as its library.  JQuery is a very powerful library for Ajax based applications used by  a lot of developers worldwide. That means IE and possibly Pocket IE  could have the ability of handling Ajax based websites soon in the future. </span></p>
<p><span style="small;">Windows 7 Mobile may not be  here yet until late next year, but expect a great buzz once this OS  for mobile phones is released. </span></p>
No Tags<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.surfacerama.com%2F2008%2F10%2F02%2Fthe-ups-and-downs-of-windows-7-mobile%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'The+Ups+and+Downs+of+Windows+7+Mobile';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/10/02/the-ups-and-downs-of-windows-7-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 Alpha is Coming</title>
		<link>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/10/02/windows-7-alpha-is-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/10/02/windows-7-alpha-is-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfacerama.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pack your bags – we’re  going to Professional Developers Conference at the end of October. It  will feature the latest innovations in cloud computing wherein demos  and applications for cloud computing will be distributed to every attendee  in a 160GB hard drive. Although cloud computing hopes to revolutionize  the programming [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="small;">Pack your bags – we’re  going to Professional Developers Conference at the end of October. It  will feature the latest innovations in cloud computing wherein demos  and applications for cloud computing will be distributed to every attendee  in a 160GB hard drive. Although cloud computing hopes to revolutionize  the programming industry; one particular OS is expected to be inside  the 160GB HD – Windows 7. The operating system is finally coming and  will be available in PDC. This release will still be an Alpha or a “pre-beta”  release which means few tweaks and bug fixes on the operating system  is needed before the commercial version will be released. </span></p>
<p><span style="small;">There a lot of questions being  asked right now that could be answered in this Alpha version. Among  them is the integration of Multi-Touch interface. A lot of talk about  this feature and Microsoft has already shown their wares through Microsoft  Surface. The multi-touch interface of Microsoft is already being used  in Sheraton Hotels and even in MSNBC. </span></p>
<p><span style="small;">The doubt for the multi-touch  interface being integrated in Windows 7 stems from the earlier than  expected release of Windows 7. Vista has never gathered enough positive  reviews and sales that have pushed Microsoft to stand by the latest  OS for a few more years. As the damage of Vista has already been admitted,  Microsoft will release Windows 7 earlier with the hopes of repairing  the dwindling perception of Microsoft especially on its operating system.  Because of the rush, the multi-touch interface might not be integrated  yet. No one really knows and it can only be answered during PDC. It  is expected that the stable version of Windows 7 will be available at  the end of 2009 or early 2010. </span></p>
<p><span style="small;">Additional add-ons are expected  in Windows 7 such as Windows Live downloads. The boot up time as well  as general design is expected to improve in the upcoming version of  Microsoft’s operating system. </span></p>
No Tags<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.surfacerama.com%2F2008%2F10%2F02%2Fwindows-7-alpha-is-coming%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Windows+7+Alpha+is+Coming';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/10/02/windows-7-alpha-is-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 and Windows Mojave</title>
		<link>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/26/windows-7-and-windows-mojave/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/26/windows-7-and-windows-mojave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfacerama.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows Mojave is not Windows 7.  At least, that&#8217;s what the official story from Microsoft happens to be.
If you&#8217;ve been anywhere outside of a cave over the course of the last few months, you have likely heard of the Mojave Experiment that Microsoft carried out.  It was designed to trick people into using Windows Vista [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Mojave is not Windows 7.  At least, that&#8217;s what the official story from Microsoft happens to be.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve been anywhere outside of a cave over the course of the last few months, you have likely heard of the Mojave Experiment that Microsoft carried out.  It was designed to trick people into using Windows Vista and then to catch the surprised expressions on their faces when they found out that the system they enjoyed using (Windows Mojave) was actually a system they were conditioned to hate (Windows Vista).  The message on the part of Microsoft was that Vista was a fantastic system but also one that was highly misunderstood by its critics.</p>
<p>Well, Windows Vista has been a big bomb in spite of the Mojave Experiment and in an effort to save face (not to mention market share), it appears as though Microsoft has decided to up the ante on their Windows 7 operating system, bringing it onto the market in beta form a lot earlier than many people may have thought possible.  However, many in the technology market are very suspicious at this latest turn of events and some have even gone so far as to suggest that the beta of Windows 7 might be another Windows Mojave, designed to trick people into using Windows Vista under another name.</p>
<p>One of the elements that seem to have disappeared from the drawing board is the massive Multitouch support that Microsoft had promised to introduce throughout Windows 7.  That support appears to be nowhere near as intense now, leaving Multitouch fans to hold their collective breath until the beta comes out.</p>
No Tags<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.surfacerama.com%2F2008%2F09%2F26%2Fwindows-7-and-windows-mojave%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Windows+7+and+Windows+Mojave';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/26/windows-7-and-windows-mojave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 Mobile Likely to be Delayed</title>
		<link>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/25/windows-7-mobile-likely-to-be-delayed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/25/windows-7-mobile-likely-to-be-delayed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surface News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfacerama.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows 7 Mobile is the operating system of choice for people using smart phones and many other electronic handheld hardware devices.  As far as the operating system is concerned however, a delay appears to be what is in the process.  Recent information obtained through a leaked document appears to point to the system being released [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 Mobile is the operating system of choice for people using smart phones and many other electronic handheld hardware devices.  As far as the operating system is concerned however, a delay appears to be what is in the process.  Recent information obtained through a leaked document appears to point to the system being released for about another 14-16 months.  This information, if true, would represent a delay of about six months over the figure that had last been given to the public by Microsoft.</p>
<p>Windows 7 Mobile in many ways is arguably more anticipated than its counterpart for conventional computers.  The Windows 6.1 Mobile system had a number of problems with it, suffering from bloating in the same way that Windows Vista did.  While it is not known whether Windows 7 Mobile will correct this problem, the leaked documents do describe Multitouch functionality that is far greater than anything Windows has brought to the market before in its mobile devices.</p>
<p>Theoretically, people with Windows 7 Mobile would be able to use a combination of their fingers and a stylus to input information onto a touch screen.  They can use just the stylus, just one finger or a combination of multiple fingers to input commands and they can use gestures like finger swipes much in the same way that users of the iPhone already can.  Additionally, Windows 7 Mobile appears to support jiggling motions, allowing you to shake a device or flick it to make different things happen.  A lot of this is speculation based on a leaked document of unknown authenticity, but it certainly does present some interesting ideas.</p>
No Tags<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.surfacerama.com%2F2008%2F09%2F25%2Fwindows-7-mobile-likely-to-be-delayed%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Windows+7+Mobile+Likely+to+be+Delayed';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/25/windows-7-mobile-likely-to-be-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Apple Replaced Microsoft?</title>
		<link>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/25/has-apple-replaced-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/25/has-apple-replaced-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfacerama.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an excellent article recently written on PC World, tech analyst Mike Elgan points out that Apple may have replaced Microsoft as the computer company that people love to hate.  As he admits in the article, his goal in doing this was not to bury Apple, but rather to point out that neither Apple nor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an excellent article recently written on PC World, tech analyst Mike Elgan points out that Apple may have replaced Microsoft as the computer company that people love to hate.  As he admits in the article, his goal in doing this was not to bury Apple, but rather to point out that neither Apple nor Microsoft deserved a lot of the vitriol heaped at them in terms of bundling software and forcing it on users as well as using the large inertia of their monopoly-like companies to bowl over competitors and stifle creativity in the marketplace as a result.</p>
<p>You can get a good lowdown on exactly how Apple is doing today what Microsoft used to do from that article, but there is a point missed in that article that intimately relates to Multitouch.  That topic is how Apple came to replace Microsoft as the major industry player.</p>
<p>In the opinion of many, the reason this happened was that Microsoft&#8217;s monopoly-like inertia reached past a critical point.  When this happened, instead of stifling the competition in the marketplace, Microsoft became old news, unable to respond to changes in the marketplace and changes in consumer behaviour.  The Surface Computer (an overpriced flashy item that does nothing for the average person) and Windows Vista (quite possibly the worst operating system in history, especially from a mobile and Multitouch point of view) are very good indications of that.</p>
<p>Since the consumers are mostly interested in mobile Multitouch products at the moment, Apple seems to be top dog.  If they want to avoid Microsoft&#8217;s fate however, they need to be more on the ball in responding the next time the tech marketplace undergoes a large shift.</p>
No Tags<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.surfacerama.com%2F2008%2F09%2F25%2Fhas-apple-replaced-microsoft%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Has+Apple+Replaced+Microsoft%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/25/has-apple-replaced-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Surface Strikes Again</title>
		<link>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/09/microsoft-surface-strikes-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/09/microsoft-surface-strikes-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surface News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfacerama.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be completely foolish for anyone that knows anything about analyzing the electronics industry to write off a product that Microsoft has created.  If there is one thing the corporation has shown again and again it is that they can market a thoroughly bad product to death and make it into a good product [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be completely foolish for anyone that knows anything about analyzing the electronics industry to write off a product that Microsoft has created.  If there is one thing the corporation has shown again and again it is that they can market a thoroughly bad product to death and make it into a good product through sheer force of will.  The Surface is by no means a bad product in the absolute sense, but has been made to look bad because of cost overruns and a comparatively fantastic iPhone sales number.  However, Microsoft has been plugging away with the Surface, getting marketing deal after marketing deal to the point where the Surface Computer and the Multitouch technology it carries has been recognized as a mainstream product in hotels and retail stores around the country.</p>
<p>Now, with yet another astonishing marketing turn, Microsoft has been able to market the Surface Computer to MSNBC for their coverage of the 2008 American Presidential Election.  This coverage is something that is very much enhanced by the Multitouch display that has allowed people to touch places on a map of the country and then move votes to or from those places by virtue of dragging their fingers across the screen.  The newest Surface Computer that MSNBC is using actually comes with McCain and Obama action figures, both of which are uniquely recognized by the Surface display.</p>
<p>With this kind of theatre you can only tip your hat off to the Microsoft Corporation that is really pulling out all the stops to make their Surface Computer as mainstream as possible.</p>
No Tags<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.surfacerama.com%2F2008%2F09%2F09%2Fmicrosoft-surface-strikes-again%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Microsoft+Surface+Strikes+Again';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/09/microsoft-surface-strikes-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Multitouch Technology Heating Up</title>
		<link>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/02/wall-multitouch-technology-heating-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/02/wall-multitouch-technology-heating-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surface News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfacerama.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of all of the different developments that have taken place in the Multitouch category recently, it can be argued that the advent of wall Multitouch technology is definitely the most interesting.  The wall technology has been created by Microsoft in an effort to make their Multitouch products more accessible for the average human being.  After [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all of the different developments that have taken place in the Multitouch category recently, it can be argued that the advent of wall Multitouch technology is definitely the most interesting.  The wall technology has been created by Microsoft in an effort to make their Multitouch products more accessible for the average human being.  After all, while the Surface Computer is a very impressive piece of technology, it&#8217;s not really something that would interest people outside of technology circles.  Wall Multitouch displays on the other hand can be used by anyone including conventional desktop computer users that want to incorporate Multitouch into their everyday lives.</p>
<p>However, it appears as though Microsoft is not alone in their plans for Multitouch, although the competition this time around is coming from an unexpected source.</p>
<p>Newly launched Multitouch hardware company Multi Touch Incorporated has come out with a new product known as the Multi Touch Cell.  This device is designed to function exactly like Microsoft&#8217;s Multitouch wall unit with additional functionality and a cost that might present more value for the dollar to savvy technology consumers.  For this reason, it is quite obvious that the unveiling at this time was done so that Multi Touch could take aim at Microsoft&#8217;s product and steal a portion of the wall market away from the software giant.  If they&#8217;re successful, it would represent the second consecutive loss that Microsoft has taken in a battle over a specific portion of the Multitouch market.</p>
No Tags<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.surfacerama.com%2F2008%2F09%2F02%2Fwall-multitouch-technology-heating-up%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Wall+Multitouch+Technology+Heating+Up';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.surfacerama.com/2008/09/02/wall-multitouch-technology-heating-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
